ETIKA DAN RISIKO KECERDASAN ARTIFISIAL GENERATIF: IMPLIKASI DALAM PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM DAN MASYARAKAT DIGITAL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35316/edupedia.v10i2.7588Keywords:
Generative AI, IRE, Ethics, Educational Technology, Artificial IntelligenceAbstract
Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has increasingly influenced educational practices, including Islamic Religious Education (IRE), by enabling automated content creation, AI-based assessment, and adaptive learning. However, its use also raises ethical concerns related to transparency, fairness, copyright, religious misinformation, data bias, and student privacy. This article critically examines the concepts, implementation, ethical dimensions, and potential risks of generative AI in education, with particular attention to its relevance within IRE. Employing a systematic literature review of indexed academic publications, international policy reports, and ethical frameworks for AI in education, the study finds that generative AI can serve as an effective supportive technology for IRE when used responsibly and grounded in core Islamic values, including trustworthiness (amanah), justice (‘adl), honesty (ṣidq), and public interest (maṣlaḥah). The findings reaffirm the central role of IRE teachers as moral guides, interpreters of Islamic teachings, and pedagogical decision-makers, while positioning generative AI as an assistive tool that enhances learning rather than replacing the educator’s moral and spiritual authority. This study contributes both theoretically and practically to the development of ethical, inclusive, and context-sensitive policies and practices for the use of generative AI in Islamic Religious Education.
References
AlAli, R., Wardat, Y., Al-Saud, K., & Alhayek, K. (2024). Generative AI in Education: Best Practices for Successful Implementation. International Journal of Religion, 5(9). https://doi.org/10.61707/pkwb8402.
AI Dungeon (2019). AI Dungeon (interactive text adventure). Latitude
Binns, R. (2018). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/binns18a.html
Brown, T. et al. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14165. Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., Jagielski, M., Herbert-Voss, A., Lee, K., ... & Erlingsson, U.
(2021). Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models. USENIX Security
Symposium.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Davoodifard, M., & Eskin, D. (2024). Exploring the Role of Generative AI in Second Language Education: Insights for Instruction, Learning, and Assessment. Studies in Applied Linguistics & TESOL,
24(1). https://doi.org/10.52214/salt.v24i1.12863
Dicoding Indonesia (2025), Belajar Dasar Artificial Intellegency, Decoding Academy.
Direktorat Jenderal Guru, Tenaga Kependidikan dan Pendidikan Guru Kementerian Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah (2025) Modul 4 Pemrograman Kecerdasan Artifisial, (Bimbingan Teknis Guru Koding dan Kecerdasan Artifisial Jenjang SMA/SMK)
Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A Unified Framework of Five Principles for AI in Society. Harvard Data Science Review.
Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-018-9482-5
Gebru, T. et al. (2018). Datasheets for Datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.09010.
Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y. (2014). Generative adversarial nets. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 27. https://papers.nips.cc/paper_files/paper/2014
Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Meechan, D. (2024). Generative AI for Students: The Essential Guide to Using Artificial Intelligence for Study at University. London: Sage.
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54(6). https://doi.org/10.1145/345760
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications.
Minhaji, Kawakip, A. N., Nawafil, M., Asmuki, & Junaidi. (2025). Developing an Integrated E- Module on Religious Moderation to Address Rising Radicalism in Schools: Implications for Students’ Understanding. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 22(2), 363–384. https:
/doi.org/10.14421/jpai.v22i2.11869
Mitchell, Tom M. (1997), Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill
OECD. (2019). OECD Principles on Artificial Intelligence. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach (4th ed.). Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Samuelson, P. (2021). Generative AI and Copyright Law. Berkeley Technology Law Journal.
Sibuea, N., Suwianto, P., Rinanda, T., et al. (2024). Pemanfaatan Panduan Praktis Generative AI untuk Efektivitas Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi. Jurnal PKM – Journal Liaison Academia and Society (J-LAS), 4(4)
Sinha, A., Goyal, S., Sy, Z., et al. (2024). BoilerTAI: A Platform for Enhancing Instruction Using Generative AI in Educational Forums. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.13196
Stanford HAI. (2024). View of The Psychosocial Impacts of Generative AI Harms. Stanford University. Sugiyono. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Alfabeta.
Teaching AI Best Practices. (2024). University of Florida AI Initiative.
The Alan Turing Institute. (2024). Generative Artificial Intelligence in Education: Opportunities and Challenges. London: Turing Institute.
Undang-undang Nomor 27 tahun 2022 tentang Perlindungan Data Pribadi
UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for Generative AI in Education and Research. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization
University of Florida. (2024). Teaching AI: Best Practices. University of Florida AI Initiative. VanLehn, K. (2011). The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems,
and Other Tutoring Systems. Educational Psychologist, 46(4).
https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2011.611369
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., ... & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shokhibul Mighfar, Moh. Hafid, Iklilah Qotrinnada
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam adopts the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which allows users to reproduce, modify, and distribute published articles in any medium for lawful purposes, provided that appropriate attribution is given to the original author(s) and the journal, the license is properly cited, any changes are clearly indicated, and derivative works are distributed under identical licensing terms.
Upon publication in Jurnal Kesehatan Vokasional, authors confer to third parties the rights to use their articles in compliance with the Creative Commons Attribution–ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s), without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
