Publication Ethics Statement

As a peer-reviewed journal, Edupedia: Jurnal Studi Pendidikan dan Pedagogi Islam always to be a leading platform and an authoritative source of information. These statements outline the ethical responsibilities of all individuals participating in the publication process of this journal, including authors, editors, and peer reviewers. This statement is based on the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) Guidelines on Good Publication Practice. Establishing shared standards of ethical conduct is essential for everyone involved in the publishing process

Fair Play. Editors must always assess manuscripts based solely on their intellectual merit, without considering the authors’ race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, ethnicity, nationality, or political views.

Confidentiality. Editors and editorial staff are required to keep all information regarding submitted manuscripts confidential, sharing it only with the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, editorial advisors, and the publisher, as necessary.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest. Editors must not use any unpublished content from submitted manuscripts in their own research without the author’s explicit written permission. Any privileged information or ideas gained through the peer review process must remain confidential and must not be exploited for personal benefit. Reviewers should refrain from evaluating manuscripts if they have a conflict of interest due to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with the authors, affiliated institutions, or related organizations.

Promptness. Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality. Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity. Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Reporting Standards. Authors reporting original research must provide a precise description of the work conducted and an unbiased analysis of its importance. The data presented should be accurate and truthfully represented in the manuscript. Sufficient details and references should be included to allow others to replicate the study. Deliberately false or misleading statements are unethical and will not be tolerated.

Acknowledgement of Sources. Reviewers should point out relevant published works that have not been cited by the authors. If a statement, finding, or argument has been previously reported, it should be supported with the appropriate citation. Reviewers are also expected to inform the editor of any significant similarities or overlaps between the manuscript under review and any other published work that may suggest potential plagiarism.

Data Access and Retention. Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.