KEKUATAN HUKUM SERTIFIKAT ELEKTRONIK SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM SENGKETA JUAL BELI TANAH

Raffi Fikriansyah Lipurta; Suwarno Abadi

doi:10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i1.1197-1210

Authors

Raffi Fikriansyah Lipurta Universitas Wijaya Putra
Suwarno Abadi Universitas Wijaya Putra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i1.1197-1210

Keywords:

Electronic certificate, legal force, evidence, sale and purchase dispute, electronic transaction

Abstract

The development of information technology in Indonesia has brought significant changes to the practice of land sale and purchase transactions, particularly through electronic mechanisms. Electronic certificates function as instruments for data and identity authentication, yet they also raise debates regarding their legal validity and position as evidence in land dispute cases. This study aims to examine the legal status of electronic certificates as valid evidence within Indonesia’s legal system and to assess their effectiveness in providing legal protection for parties engaging in digital transactions. The research method employed is a normative juridical approach by reviewing relevant regulations, including Law Number 11 of 2008 on Information and Electronic Transactions and its amendment through Law Number 19 of 2016, as well as implementing regulations concerning electronic certificates, namely Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency Regulation Number 1 of 2021 and Ministerial Regulation Number 3 of 2023. In addition, this study is supported by secondary legal materials such as literature, academic journals, and previous research. The findings indicate that electronic certificates hold equal legal standing with conventional certificates, provided they comply with the principles of authentication, data integrity, and legal verification. Moreover, electronic certificates serve not only as proof of ownership but also as instruments for dispute prevention through an integrated digital system. Nevertheless, their implementation still faces challenges, including limited infrastructure, gaps in digital literacy, and public concerns regarding data security

References

Adiwibowo, Nadifa Aulia, and Luthfi Muta’ali. “Analisis Yuridis Kekuatan Hukum Serifikat Elektronik Dalam Pembuktian Hukum Acara Perdata.” Widya Bhumi 5, no. 1 (2025): 73–86.

Ahoen, Bahori. “Analisis Kekuatan, Kerentanan, Dan Tantangan Pembuktian Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Locus Penelitian Dan Pengabdian 4, no. 9 (2025): 8414–28. https://doi.org/10.58344/locus.v4i9.4784.

Aji Permana, Bayu, Abdul Halim, and Ali Uraidi. “Kekuatan Hukum Pembuktian Sertifikat Elektronik Dalam Perkara Perdata Menurut Peraturan Mentri ATR/Kepala BPN No 3 Tahun 2023 Tentang Penerbitan Sertifikat Elektronik Dalam Kegiatan Pendaftaran Tanah.” Jurnal Ilmiah AKSES 2, no. 1 (2024): 61–75.

Alimuddin, Nur Hidayani. “Implementasi Sertifikat Elektronik Sebagai Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Hak Atas Tanah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Sasi 27, no. 28 (2021): 335–45.

Alwi, Ahmad Junaidi, and Maria Novita Apriyani. “Unsur Baru Tindak Pidana Perjudian Online Berdasarkan Undang- Undang Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 579/PID.B/2023/PN SBY).” HUMKY Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (2024): 710–24.

Andari, Dwi Wulan Titik, and Dian Aries Mujiburohman. “Aspek Hukum Layanan Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik.” Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum 15, no. 1 (2023): 154. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v15i1.7367.

Ardan, Isnaeni, Hambali Thalib, and Lauddin Marsuni. “Keabsahan Digital Signature/Tanda Tangan Elektronik Dinjau Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Dan UU ITE Eka.” Journal of Lex Generalis (JLS) 2, no. 3 (2022): 404–17.

Asnawi, Eddy, and Robert Libra. “Analisis Yuridis Mengenai Pembuktian Informasi Dan Dokumen Elektronik Pada Sengketa Proses Pemilihan Umum Di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara.” HUKMY Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 1 (2024): 553–67. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2024.v4i1.553-567.

Derlan, Mariana, Masia Harahap, and Luluk Tri Harinie. “Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Sentuh Tanahku Guna Perbaikan Kinerja Layanan Di Kantor Pertanahan Kota Palangka Raya.” Jurnal Edunomics 4, no. 2 (2023): 103–25.

Ghaniyyu, Faris Faza, Yani Pujiwati, and Betty Rubiati. “Jaminan Kepastian Hukum Konversi Sertipikat Menjadi Elektronik Serta Perlindungannya Sebagai Alat Pembuktian Legal Certainly Convertion Of Land Certificate Form To Electronic And Proff Of Rights Holders Berbentuk Fisik Sebagaimana Disebutkan Dalam UUPA Da.” Jurnal USM Law Review 5, no. 1 (2022): 172–87.

Habibi, Sy Arifin, Ghally Sukma Prambudi, Tuti Trisnawati, and Ratna Wulandari. “Transformasi Digital Administrasi Pertanahan : Implementasi Dan Tantangan Sertipikat Elektronik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Rio Law, 2025.

Hak, Kepemilikan, Milik Atas, Andi Adinda, and Andi Tira. “Legal Position of Electronic Certificate as Proof of Ownership of Land Ownership Rights.” Clavia: Journal of Law, 2023, 411–19.

Julianus. “Analisis Hukum Peralihan Sertifikat Tanah Konvensional Kesertifikat Tanah Elektronik Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Peraturan Menteri ATR/KEPALA BPN No. 1 TAHUN 2021.” Jurnal Media Akademi 3, no. 7 (2025).

Juliyanti, Ni, I Dharsana, and Ni Ujianti. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Tanah Digital Dikaitkan Dengan Keamanan Data Pribadi.” Jurnal Preferensi Hukum 4, no. 1 (2023): 91–97.

Mansyur, Amin. “Urgensi Penerapan Sertipikat Tanah Secara Elektronik.” Jurnal Repertorium 12, no. 1 (2023): 15–26. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v12i1.2645.

Mary, Dina. “Analisis Sosialisasi Dan Dampak Penerapan Sertifikat Elektronik Pada Masyarakat” 19 (2025): 1514–23.

Mulyana Darusman, Yoyon. “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Otentik Dan Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” ADIL: Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2022): 36–56. https://doi.org/10.33476/ajl.v7i1.331.

Putra, Reza Andriansyah, and Atik Winanti. “Urgensi Penerbitan Dokumen Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik Pasca Peraturan Menteri ATR / BPN Nomor 3 Tahun 2023 Urgency for the Issuance of Electronic Land Certificate Documents After the Regulation of the Minister of ATR / BPN Number 3 of 2023.” USM Law 7, no. 2 (2024): 835–52.

S., Sepriyadi Adhan, Ati Yuniati, and Muhammad Labib Muhadz. “Electronic Certificate Perspective in Civil Law Evidence.” Proceedings of the Universitas Lampung International Conference on Social Sciences (ULICoSS 2021) 628, no. ULICoSS 2021 (2022): 339–48. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220102.043.

Sormin, Carmenita Angelina, M Hamidi Masykur, and Cyndiarnis Cahyaning Putri. “DOI : Https://Doi.Org/10.21776/Rechtjiva.V2n1.6 Perlindungan Data Pribadi Dan Kaitannnya Dengan Asas Publisitas Pada Sertifikat Tanah Elektronik DOI : Https://Doi.Org/10.21776/Rechtjiva.V2n1.6.” Jurnal Rechtjiva 2, no. 1 (2025): 86–105.

Yoyon, Oleh :, and Mulyana Darusman. “Kedudukan Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Otentik Dan Sebagai Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Jurnal Hukum 7, no. 1 (2023): 38–56.

Yusuf, Andi M Reyza, Universitas Padjadjaran, Nia Kurniati, Universitas Padjadjaran, Yenni Yunithawati Rukmana, and Universitas Padjadjaran. “Pelaksanaan Pendaftaran Tanah Secara Elektronik Pada Badan Pertanahan Nasional Dan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah.” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas 7 (2024): 271–89.