LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS ACTORS FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF CIGARETTES THAT DO NOT MEET PRODUCT STANDARDS

ind

Authors

  • Fadel Muhammad Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tadulako
  • Sutarman Yodo Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tadulako
  • Ratu Ratna Korompot Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i2.1380-1393

Keywords:

Anggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha; Rokok Smith; Perlindungan Konsumen; Cukai; Standar Produk.

Abstract

The circulation of cigarettes that do not meet product standards remains a persistent issue in commercial activities in Palu City. One product that has attracted particular attention is Smith-brand cigarettes, which are suspected of failing to comply with legal requirements, particularly regarding excise stamps, product information, and health warnings on packaging. This study aims to analyze the legal responsibility of business actors for the distribution of Smith-brand cigarettes that do not meet product standards. The research employs an empirical legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Data were obtained through field research conducted at the Customs and Excise Supervision and Service Office (KPPBC) Pantoloan, Palu City, and supported by library research. The findings indicate that business actors bear legal responsibility for ensuring that the products they distribute comply with applicable legal standards. The circulation of Smith-brand cigarettes without excise stamps and without adequate product information and health warnings constitutes a violation of consumer protection regulations and excise laws. Business actors may therefore be held liable through legal compliance measures, compensation for losses, and product withdrawal from the market. The large number of Smith-brand cigarettes confiscated by Customs and Excise authorities demonstrates that the distribution of such products remains widespread within retail networks. Therefore, stronger supervision and law enforcement are required to protect consumers and ensure legal certainty in commercial activities.

References

Andre Salukh et al, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Rokok Yang Tidak Mencantumkan Informasi Dan Peringatan Kesehatan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Artemis Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2024, https://ejurnal.undana.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/19124/7097.

Andre Salukh et al, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Rokok Yang Tidak Mencantumkan Informasi Dan Peringatan Kesehatan Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen, Artemis Law Journal, Vol. 2, No. 1, 2024, https://ejurnal.undana.ac.id/index.php/alj/article/view/19124/7097.

Asri Lasatu et al, Outline of the Consumer Dispute Resolution Agency as a Means of Legal Protection: Is It Optimal?, Jambura Law Review, Vol 4, No. 2, 2022, http://ejurnal.ung.ac.id/index.php/jalrev/%09%09%09.

Asri Lasatu et al, View of Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen Dimasa Pandemi COVID-19, Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, No. 4, 2023, https://jurnal.syntaxliterate.co.id/index.php/syntax-literate/article/view/11105/7324.

Aulia Muthiah, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Kepada Konsumen Tentang Keamanan Pangan Dalam Persfektif Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen, Dialogia Iuridica, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2016, https://journal.maranatha.edu/index.php/dialogia/article/view/712/708.

Gunawan Arifin et al, Penyuluhan Hukum Tentang Mahasiswa Sebagai Motivator Perlindungan Konsumen Di Kota Palu, Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia (JAMSI), Vol. 2, No. 1, 2022, https://jamsi.jurnal-id.com/index.php/jamsi/article/view/190/117.

Louis Yulius, Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Atas Produk Yang Merugikan Konsumen, Lex Privatum, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2013, https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3049.

Mohamad Hilman Fi’aunillah & Masruri Muchtar, Sudah Efektifkah Operasi Pasar Peredaran Rokok Ilegal ?, Jurnal Info Artha, Vol. 5, No. 2, 2021, https://jurnal.pknstan.ac.id/index.php/JIA/article/view/1278/724.

Putu Agus Rio Krisnawan et al, Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Usaha Rokok Tanpa Pitaicukai Menurut Undang-Undanginomor 8 Tahun 1999 Tentang Perlindungan Konsumen Dikabupaten Buleleng,” E-Journal Komunikasi Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2024, https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jatayu/article/view/94162.

Syafliansah et al, Metode Penelitian Hukum, Zahir Publishing, Samarinda, 2025, https://zahirpublishing.net/detail-metode-penelitian-hukum-716.

Teras Sulawesi, KPPBC Terus Tingkatkan Pengawasan Peredaran Rokok Ilegal, 2024, http://www.terassulawesi.com/kppbc-terus-tingkatkan-pengawasan-peredaran-rokok-ilegal/. Diakses pada tanggal 16 September 2025 Pukul 20:54

Wildatul Aliyah, Analisis Hukum Islam Terhadap Peredaran Rokok Ilegal Tanpa Cukai Di Indonesia, UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember, 2024, http://digilib.uinkhas.ac.id/id/eprint/31727.

Yusuf Daeng, Analisis Yuridis Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Rokok Ilegal Tanpa Pita Cukai Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 39 Tahun 2007 Tentang Cukai, Journal Of Social Science Research, Vol. 3, No. 6, 2023, https://j-innovative.org/index.php/Innovative.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-10

How to Cite

Muhammad , F., Yodo, S., & Korompot, R. R. (2026). LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF BUSINESS ACTORS FOR THE DISTRIBUTION OF CIGARETTES THAT DO NOT MEET PRODUCT STANDARDS: ind. HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum, 6(2), 1380–1393. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2026.v6i2.1380-1393