The Effectiveness of Mind Mapping Phonetic Symbol Media to Eliminate The Confusion of Pronunciation:

M. Hilmy Hidayatullah; Annisa Kurniaasri; Ismil  Asiffin; Sirrul  Bari

doi:10.35316/joey.2022.v1i2.56-66

M. Hilmy Hidayatullah Universitas Ibrahimy
Annisa Kurniaasri Universitas Ibrahimy
Ismil Asiffin Universitas Ibrahimy
Sirrul Bari Universitas Ibrahimy

10.35316/joey.2022.v1i2.56-66

Keywords: Keywords: Mind Mapping Phonetic Symbol, Confusion of Pronunciation

Abstract

Pronunciation was one of difficult skill, it made many people confused. This research aimed to determine a solution by using mind mapping phonetic symbol media to eliminate the confusion of pronunciation. The content of mind mapping showed the part of phonetic symbol to study the sound of words. It has helped the understanding of some difference sounds. This research used quantitative true-experimental method by pre-posttest control group design. The tests carried out are validity, reliability, descriptive analysis, and t-test. Subject of this research is 30, it was divided 15 students for experiment group and 15 control group. The sample was taken by using random sampling and applied Slovin formula. While, the data was obtained by using reading test. The value of descriptive analysis there was a raising value which can be seen from mean post-test experiment group 72 it was higher than control group 36.6. And also, the quarrel of normal gain between experiment group and control group showed 75%>28.57%, 3 students from experiment group than a student of control group. Furthermore, the value of t-test was there was an influence to eliminate the confusion of pronunciation by using mind mapping phonetic symbol, it can be seen from the trials that have been tested in SPSS obtaining a t-count value of 8,290 > 1,7, it can be said that H₀ is rejected and H_a accepted which it means that There is an influence of mind mapping phonetic symbol media (X) to eliminate the confusion of pronunciation (Y).

References

Arulselvi, E. (2017). Mind Maps in Classroom Teaching and Learning. Excellence in Education Journal, 6(2), 50–65.
Bordens, K., & Abbott, B. B. (2014). Ebook: Research Design and Methods: A Process Approach. McGraw Hill.
Borg, W. R. (1983). Meredith D. Gall Educational Research: An Introduction New Yor. Longman.
Boyson, G. (2009). The use of mind mapping in teaching and learning. The Learning Institute, Assignment, 3(8), 123–145.
Chan, M. J. (2018). Embodied Pronunciation Learning: Research and Practice. Catesol Journal, 30(1), 47–68.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. Sage.
Demerzen, M. (2019). The place of pronunciation spelling in foreign language teacher education. 5th Eurasian Conference on Language and Social Sciences Letoonia Golf Resort Belek, 277.
Fried, & Hisrich. (1994). Scholar (6). In Annals of Tourism Research. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160738315000444
Goodnough, K., & Long, R. (2002). Mind Mapping: A Graphic Organizer for the Pedagogical Toolbox. Science Scope, 25(8), 20–24.
Gunawan, M. A. (2015). Statistik Penelitian bidang pendidikan, psikologi dan sosial. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing.
Haghighi, M., & Rahimy, R. (2017). The effect of L2 minimal pairs practice on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ pronunciation accuracy. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(1), 42–48.
Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics.
Isnawati, N., Harjono, A., & Gunada, I. W. (2020). Hasil Belajar Fisika Dengan Model Discovery Learning. Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika Indonesia, 2(1), 11–15.
Johnson, R. B., & Christensen, L. (2019). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. Sage publications.
Pokrivčáková, S. (2015). 2.2 CALL and teaching pronunciation. CALL and Foreign Language Education: E-Textbook for Foreign Language Teachers, 110(CALL,d teaching pronunciation), 29–37. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Silvia-Pokrivcakova/publication/285592902_CALL_and_teaching_pronunciation/links/587551d708aebf17d3b3f712/CALL-and-teaching-pronunciation.pdf
Pudelko, B., Young, M., Vincent‐Lamarre, P., & Charlin, B. (2012). Mapping as a learning strategy in health professions education: a critical analysis. Medical Education, 46(12), 1215–1225.
Purwanto, E. (2008). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Qiu, M., & Hewitt, J. (2005). Integrating computer-based multimedia instructional design into teaching international English phonetic symbols. EdMedia+ Innovate Learning, 4365–4372.
Schreiber, J. B., & Asner-Self, K. (2011). The interrelationship of questions, sampling, design, and analysis. Southern Illinois University.
Sugiyono. (2008). Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. CV. Alfabeta, Bandung, 25.
Sugiyono, D. (2013). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R&D.