UKURAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP KORUPSI PENEGAK HUKUM

  • Abd. Rahman Saleh Universitas Ibrahimy
  • Asrawi Asrawi Universitas Ibrahimy
Keywords: Size of Sentencing, Corruption, Law Enforcement

Abstract

Law enforcement is again in the public spotlight without stopping. There are various findings of cases of law enforcers who are involved in actions that should not be carried out by a law enforcer. How about law enforcers who have played the law in law enforcement, of course this is a bad act that destroys the rhythm of law enforcement. Law enforcers who are made without the guts by those who deliberately play with the law with temptations and spices to give a certain amount of money, of course, this is a disgraceful trait, and can also be qualified as a corrupt act. Why is it said to be a corrupt act, none other than because he has received gratification and or has received a number of gifts, either in the form of giving money and or also providing other facilities. That the law enforcers are the Police, Prosecutors, Advocates and Judges. The four of them are chess of law enforcement agencies who have the task of law enforcement. The task of law enforcement is to enforce the law with the existing legal rails as an inherent task for law enforcement with law enforcement standards with the dignity of the law. In this article, we will discuss the sentencing measure of law enforcement corruption.

References

Alkostar Artidjo, 2013, Permasalahan gratifikasi dan pertanggungjawaban korporasi dalam Undang-undang korupsi, Majalah Varia Peradilan, Terbitan MA RI No.330.
Arnold J. Heidenheimer & Michel Johnston (eds), 2007, Political Corruption:Concepts and Contexts (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers).
Barda A. N, 2015, Beberapa aspek pengembangan ilmu hukum pidana (menyonsong generasi baru hukum pidana Indonesia) Pidato pengukuhan guru besar ilmu hukum pidana fakultas hukum Universitas Diponegoro, Penerbit Pustaka Magister Semarang.
Eccholas J. M. dan Shadily. H, Kamus Inggris Indonesia, Cetakan XXIII, Penerbit PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.
Hamzah A, 1985, Delik-delik yang tersebar di luar Kitab Undang-undang Hukum Pidana, Penerbit Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta.
Hanitjo Ronny Soemitro. Metode Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri, (Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990).
K. Prent,J. Adisubrata, dan WJS. Poerwadarminta (Penysun), Kamus Latin Indonesia.
Komisi Pemberanbtasan Korupsi Republik Indonesia, 2006, Memahami untuk membasmi,Penerbit Uni Eropa Kemitraan/Patnership dan KPK, Jakarta.
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi RI, 2006, Mengenali dan Memberantas Korupsi.
Mahmud Peter Marzuki, Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Predana Media Group, 2005).
Soekanto S. Faktor-Faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Raja (1983 Grafindo, Jakarta).
Dairani, D., 2021. sanksi tegas serta upaya hukum guna mencegah terjadinya money politic pemilu legislatif. HUKMY: Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), pp.167-182.
Susanto Mei & Ramdan Ajie, Kebijakan Moderasi Pidana Mati (Kajian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 2-3/PUU-V/2007) (Jurnal Yudisial, 2017).
Tindak Pidana Korupsi, Bab II, Pasal 2 Juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan
Published
2022-04-14
How to Cite
Saleh, A. R., & Asrawi, A. (2022). UKURAN PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP KORUPSI PENEGAK HUKUM. HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum, 2(1), 27-41. https://doi.org/10.35316/hukmy.2022.v2i1.27-41
Abstract viewed = 99 times
PDF downloaded = 135 times