PUBLICATION ETHICS

JUSTIFY : Jurnal Sistem Informasi Ibrahimy is highly committed to upholding publication ethical standards and taking all actions for any authors who commit publication malpractice. All authors who submit their work to Justify for publication as original articles attest that the submitted work is the author's contribution and has not been copied or copied in whole or in part from another work.
The authors acknowledge that they have disclosed any and all actual or potential conflicts of interest with their work or any benefit associated with it. In the same way, the journal is committed to conducting objective and fair peer reviews of works submitted for publication and to preventing actual or potential conflicts of interest between editorial personnel and reviewers and the material being reviewed. Any deviation from the rules that have been set above must be reported directly to the Editor in Chief who is strongly committed to providing fast solutions for all types of problems.
All submitted works will be checked by anti-plagiarism software. Detected plagiarism will be prohibited for further publication procedures. Authors who have committed to plagiarizing and infringing publications of other ethnicities will be banned from being published on Justify.
We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue does not influence or influence editorial decisions. In addition, the Faculty of Science and Technology of Ibrahimy University and the Editorial Board will assist in communication with other journals and/or publishers if this is useful and necessary. This statement is based on COPE’s Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

AUTHOR TASKS

Reporting Standards
Authors of original research reports must present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to enable others to replicate the work.

Data access and storage
Authors may be asked to provide raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review and must be prepared to provide public access to such data when practicable, and in any case, must be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time. after publication.

Originality and plagiarism
Authors should ensure that they have written entirely original work, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others that have been properly cited or quoted. Plagiarism takes many forms, from 'lifting' someone else's paper as the author's paper, to copying or paraphrasing important parts of another paper (without attribution), to claiming research results done by someone else. Plagiarism in all its forms is unethical and unacceptable publishing behavior.

Multiple, redundant, or concurrent publication
An author generally should not publish a manuscript describing the same research in more than one journal or major publication. Submitting the same text to more than one journal simultaneously is unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. In general, authors should not submit previously published papers to other journals for consideration. Publication of certain types of articles (e.g. guidelines, translations) in more than one journal may sometimes be justified, provided certain conditions are met. Authors and editors of the relevant journals must agree on the secondary publication, which must reflect the same data and interpretation of the primary document. Primary references must be cited in secondary publications.

Source acknowledgment
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others should always be given. Authors should cite influential publications in determining the nature of the work reported. Information obtained privately, such as in conversation, correspondence, or discussion with third parties, may not be used or reported without written permission from the source. Information obtained during confidential service, such as reference manuscripts or grant applications, may not be used without written permission from the authors of works involved in these services.

Paper writing
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, implementation, or interpretation of the research being reported on. Everyone who has made a significant contribution must be listed as a co-author (meaning that the manuscript has at least two co-authors and co-authors). Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they must be recognized or listed as contributors. Appropriate authors must ensure that all suitable co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper and that all co-authors have viewed and approved the final version of the paper and have approved their submission for publication.

Disclosure and conflict of interest
All authors must disclose in their manuscript any financial or substantive conflict of interest that could be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Examples of potential conflicts of interest that must be disclosed include employment, consulting, share ownership, honoraria, paid expert testimony, patent applications/registrations, and grants or other funding. Potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed as early as possible.

Fundamental errors in published works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his self-published work, the author must immediately notify the editor of the journal or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct the paper. If the editor or publisher learns from a third party that a published work contains significant errors, the author must immediately retract or correct the paper or provide evidence to the editor as to the veracity of the original paper.

Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects
If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must identify them in the text.

DUTIES OF THE EDITORIAL COUNCIL

Publication decision
The editor of Justify: The peer-reviewed Journal of Fisheries is responsible for deciding which articles to submit to the journal should be published. The validation of the work and its importance to researchers and readers should always drive decisions. Editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and limited by applicable legal requirements regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editor may negotiate with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair Play
Editors must evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to the author's race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy.

Confidentiality
Editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, other editorial advisors, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished material disclosed in submitted text may not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Involvement and cooperation in investigations
An editor must take reasonable responsive steps when an ethical complaint has been raised regarding a submitted manuscript or published paper, together with the publisher (or the public). These steps generally include contacting the authors of the manuscript or paper and giving proper consideration to any complaints or claims made, but may also include further communication with relevant research agencies and bodies, and if the complaint is upheld, issuing corrections, retractions, disclosures concerns, or other notes, that may be relevant. Any reported act of unethical publishing behavior should be looked into, even if it is discovered years after publication.

REVIEWER TASKS

Contribution to editorial decisions
Peer review assists editors in making editorial decisions and through editorial communication with authors can also help authors improve papers.

Speed
Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review research reported in a manuscript or knows that a rapid review is not possible must notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.

confidentiality
Any text received for review must be treated as a confidential document. They may not be shown or discussed with others except as permitted by the editors.

Objectivity standards
The review must be carried out objectively. The author's personal criticism is inappropriate. Referees must express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Source acknowledgment
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the author. Any statement that the observations, derivations, or arguments have been previously reported must be accompanied by a relevant citation. The reviewer should also call the editor's attention to any substantial similarities or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and other published papers of which one has personal knowledge.

Disclosure and conflict of interest
Unpublished material disclosed in submitted text may not be used in reviewer research without written consent from the author. Specific information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal gain. Reviewers should not consider text in which they have a conflict of interest arising from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with the author, company or institution associated with the paper.

Review Process
Every text submitted to Justify: Journal of Fisheries Science was independently reviewed by at least two reviewers. Decisions on publication, amendment or rejection are based on their reports/recommendations. In certain cases, the editor can send articles for review to other people, a third reviewer before making a decision, if necessary.