Building Empathic Relationships Between Teachers and Students: A Psychodynamic Perspective
Abstrak
This study aims to explore and analyze the importance of building empathic relationships between teachers and students in basic education, focusing on psychodynamic elements that influence these interactions. This study uses a qualitative approach with a case study method. Participants consisted of teachers and students from several elementary schools, selected through purposive sampling. The instruments used include semi-structured interview guidelines and direct observation in class, the research was analyzed using content analysis methods. Thematic analysis shows some psychodynamic elements that play a key role in building empathic relationships between teachers and students. Teacher self-awareness of student feelings and responses, clear identification of roles in class, and conflict management with a psychodynamic approach are important factors in creating healthy empathic relationships. The results show that understanding psychodynamic elements can increase the effectiveness of teachers in building empathic relationships with students. Practical implications include the development of teacher training that incorporates psychodynamic aspects to improve the quality of interactions in class. In the context of basic education, an in-depth understanding of the psychodynamic elements in teacher-student relationships makes a positive contribution to building empathic relationships that support students' learning experiences. Recommendations for further research include further exploration of educational interventions that can strengthen these psychodynamic elements.
Referensi
Cramer, P. (2015). Understanding Defense Mechanisms. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 43(4), 523-552.
Davis, H. A. (2003). Conceptualizing the role and influence of student-teacher relationships on children's social and cognitive development. Educational psychologist, 38(4), 207-234.
Etikan, I., Musa, S. A., & Alkassim, R. S. (2016). Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, 5(1), 1-4.
Freud, S. (1912). The Dynamics of Transference. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, Volume XII (1911-1913): The Case of Schreber, Papers on Technique and Other Works, 97-108.
Gu, Q., & Day, C. (2007). Teachers resilience: A necessary condition for effectiveness. Teaching and Teacher education, 23(8), 1302-1316.
Hamre, B. K., & Pianta, R. C. (2006). Student-Teacher Relationships. In G. G. Bear & K. M. Minke (Eds.), Children's needs III: Development, prevention, and intervention (p. 59–71). National Association of School Psychologists.
Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An overview of content analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479-498.
Hooks, B. (2008). Occupy parenting: Raising children as revolutionaries. In Pedagogies of crossing (pp. 147-164). Duke University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
McAllister, G., & Irvine, J. J. (2002). The Role of Empathy in Teaching Culturally Diverse Students: A Qualitative Study of Teachers’ Beliefs. Journal of Teacher Education, 53(5), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248702237397
Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847.
Rogers, C. (1951). Client-centered Therapy, Its Current Practice, Implications And Theory. London: Constable.
Rogers, C. R. (1980). A way of being. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
Sandler, J., Holder, A., Dare, C., & Dreher, A. U. (1992). Freud's models of the mind: An introduction. Karnac Books.
Schmidt, M. (2016). Classroom discourse and interaction: Recent developments and future challenges. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 275-286). Springer, Cham.
Sroufe, L. A. (2009). The concept of development in developmental psychopathology. Child development perspectives, 3(3), 178-183.
Yoon, J. S. (2002). Teacher characteristics as predictors of teacher-student relationships: Stress, negative affect, and self-efficacy. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 30(5), 485-494.