KONTESTASI ORTODOKSI DAN FILSAFAT: STUDI PEMIKIRAN AL-GHAZALI DAN IBNU RUSYD

Farkhan Fuady; Abd Chair

doi:10.35316/lisanalhal.v17i2.179-190

Farkhan Fuady Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Banten 15412, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7755-105X
Abd Chair Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta, Banten 15412, Indonesia

10.35316/lisanalhal.v17i2.179-190

Keywords: Al-Ghazali, Ibn Rosed, Islamic Orthodoxy, Islamic Philosophy

Abstract

The emergence of Islamic orthodoxy and philosophy created contestation between the two. The figure who directly confronted Muslim philosophers was Al-Ghazali. He criticized Muslim critics on several issues. Next, Ibnu Rushd appeared to answer Al-Ghazali criticism. Contestation between the two occurred in the 11th-12th century AD, but the discourse of both ideas is still widely studied today. This article analyzes the contestation of Islamic orthodoxy and philosophy in the 11th-12th centuries AD. The method used is qualitative with the type of library research. The research source comes from the works of Al-Ghazali and Ibn Rushd and was analyzed using descriptive analysis. This research shows that the contestation between orthodoxy and philosophy has been going on for a long time. As an orthodox person, Al-Ghazali tried to criticize philosophers through several issues related to philosophers' views, such as the eternity of nature, the knowledge of God, and physical resurrection, which Ibnu Rushd then answered as a philosopher. The contest between the two has experienced a long history of debate and debate. It is also necessary to understand these differences because both are an integral part of Islamic intellectual history. Both approaches have advantages and disadvantages, giving rise to dialogue and discussions relevant to the contemporary Islamic era. It should also be noted that both have a role in completing the understanding of Islam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, M. Amin. Falsafah Kalam Di Era Post Modernisme. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 1995.

Akhiyat. “Islam Nusantara Antara Ortodoksi Dan Heterodoksi.” Al -Tahrir 17, no. 1 (2017): 247–268.

Al-Ghazali, Abu Hamid. Kerancuan Filsafat (Tahafut Al-Falasifah). Yogyakarta: FORUM, 2015.

Arifin, Azis, and Jaipuri Harahap. “Kritik Al-Ghazali Terhadap Para Filsuf.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 12, no. 1 (2021): 75-94 <https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v12i1.4375>

Arifullah, Mohd. “Hubungan Sains Dan Agama (Rekonstruksi Citra Islam Di Tengah Ortodoksi Dan Perkembangan Sains Kontemporer).” Kontekstualita: Jurnal Penelitian sosial Keagamaan 21, no. 1 (2006): 1–28.

Arkoun, Muhammad. Nalar Islami Dan Nalar Modern: Berbagai Tantangan Dan Jalan Baru. Jakarta: INIS, 1994.

Asiah, Nur. “Maslahah Menurut Konsep Imam Al-Ghazali.” Diktum: urnal syariah dan Hukum 18, no. 1 (2020): 118–128 <https://doi.org/10.35905/diktum.v18i1.663>

Asy'arie, Musa. Filsafat Islam: Sunnah Nabi Dalam Berfikir. Yogyakarta: LESFI, 2001.

Azhari, Devi Syukri, and Mustapa Mustapa. “Konsep Pendidikan Islam Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran 4, no. 2 (2021): 271–278 <https://doi.org/10.31004/jrpp.v4i2.2865>

Darmawan, Dadang. “Ortodoks Heterodoks Tafsir.” Refleksi 13, no. 2 (2012): 179–200.

Eliade (ed), Mircea. The Encyclopedia of Religion. Edited by Eliade Mircea. Vol 2. New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillah, 1993.

Fauziyah, Ruhyatul. “Kebangkitan Manusia Di Akhirat Menurut Al-Ghazali Dan Ibnu Rusyd.” Aqlania: Jurnal Filsafat dan Teologi Islam 9, no. 2 (2018): 193-221 <https://doi.org/10.32678/aqlania.v9i02.2066>

Ibrahim, Ruslan. “Filsafat Islam: Kejayaan Dan Konflik Dengan Ortodoksi.” TAJDID: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Kemanusiaan 1, no. 2 (2017): 181–189 <https://doi.org/10.52266/tadjid.v1i2.43>

Jamhari, Jamhari. “Al-Ghazali Dan Oposisinya Terhadap Filsafat.” Jurnal Ilmu Agama 16, no. 1 (2015): 1–15.

Mubit, Rizal. “Pembelaan Ibnu Rusyd Terhadap Pemikiran Filsuf.” Jurnal Miyah XI, no. 01 (2016): 132–150.

Muliati. Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Kritiknya Terhadap Filsuf. II., 2016.

Mundiri, Akmal, and Ira Nawiro. “Ortodoksi Dan Heterodoksi Nilai-Nilai Di Pesantren: Studi Kasus Pada Perubahan Perilaku Santri Di Era Teknologi Digital.” Jurnal Tatsqif: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Pendidikan 17, no. 1 (2019): 1–18 <https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v17i1.527>

Ngazizah, Dhaoul, and Kholid Mawardi. “Integrasi Filsafat Dan Agama Dalam Perspektif Ibnu Rusyd.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education 8, no. 1 (2022): 588–595 <https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i1.2746>

Nursalikah, Ani. “Tahafut Al-Falasifah, Kontroversi Filsafat.” Khazanah.Republika.Co.Id. Last modified 2014. Accessed June 28, 2023 <https://khazanah.republika.co.id/berita/n2txop/tahafut-alfalasifah-kontroversi-ranah-filsafat-1>

Rahman, Fazlur. Islam. Bandung: Pustaka, 2000.

Reese, William L. Dictionary Od Philosophy and Religion, Eastern Adn Western Thought. New York: Humanity Books, 1996.

Ridwan, Muhammad Mahfuh. “Kafirnya Filsuf Muslim: Ibn Rusyd Meluruskan Al-Ghazali.” Jurnal Kontemplasi 4, no. 01 (2016): 165–178 <https://doi.org/10.21274/kontem.2016.4.1.165-178>

Rusyd, Ibnu. Tahafut At-Tahafut. Edited by Amien Rauzani Pane. Cetakan 1. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2004.

Sirajuddin. “Konsep Pemikiran Ekonomi Al-Ghazali.” LAA Maisyir 3, no. 1 (2016): 46–60.

Sri Kurnialis, and Husni Thamrin. “Mudharabah Dalam Pemikiran Ibnu Rusyd.” Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah 4, no. 2 (2021): 52–59 <https://doi.org/10.25299/syarikat.2021.vol4(2).8521>

Tedy, Armin. “Kritik Ibnu Rusyd Terhadap Tiga Kerancuan Berfikir Al-Ghazali.” El-Afkar: Jurnal Pemikiran Keislaman dan Tafsir Hadis 5, no. 1 (2016): 11–20.

Zamzamy, Muawiin Bihac, Nirwan Syafrin Manurung, and Fahmi Irfani. “Gerakan Da’wah Ishlah Imam Al-Ghazali Dan Pengaruhnya Dalam Sejarah Lahirnya Gerakan Shalahuddin Al-Ayyubi.” Kommunika: Journal of Communication Science and Islamic Da'wah 2, no. 2 (2018): 93–104.