DEVELOPMENT PRIORITY ON SEAWEED KAPPAPHYCUS ALVAREZII CULTIVATION IN AREA CLUSTER KOLONO DISTRICT KONAWE SOUTH
Abstract
Cluster Kolono Konawe South, Southeast Sulawesi Province is an area that has the potential of the sea to be developed by seaweed cultivation activities Kappahycus alvarezii, with the benefit of creating regional economic improvement. So far, the development of commercial seaweed cultivation is still lacking so that people's income and local revenue are not optimal. One of the causes is the absence of strategic planning and policy in the development of seaweed cultivation. As a first step, it is necessary to determine the priorities for the development of cultivation K. alvarezii in the Kolono cluster area. The method applied in collecting research data is observation, interviews, and questionnaires. Policy priority scale analysis is determined by the Analytical Hierarchy Process (PHA). The results of the study showed that the cultivation activities of K. alvarezii in the Kolono cluster area, South Konawe District required improvements in several factors, namely the availability of human resources, improvement of the capital system, and the detection of an appropriate aquatic environment. To maintain/sustain the aquaculture business K. alvarezii, some strategic policies are needed. The practical alternative policy that can be done in the short term by the South Konawe District government in the Klater Kolono area is to conduct training and demonstration of cultivation K. alvarezii which includes cultivation design, site selection, planter preparation, seed preparation, maintenance, harvest and post-harvest techniques, processes sales and profit value and capital flow.
Downloads
References
Alonso, J.A., and M.T. Lamata. 2006. Consistency in the analytic hierarchy process: a new approach. International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, Vol. 14 No. 4: 445-459.
Badan Perencanaan dan Pembangunan Daerah Kabupaten Konawe Selatan. 2011. Laporan Akhir Rencana Aksi Pengembangan Minapolitan Kabupaten Konawe Selatan.
Batista, M.I. and H.N. Cabral. 2016. An overview of Marine Protected Areas in SW Europe: factors contributing to their management effectiveness. Ocean Coast. Manag. Vol. 132 : 15–23.
Bengen, D.G. 2005. Pentingnya Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir Terpadu Berbasis Kesesuaian Lingkungan bagi Keberlanjutan Pembangunan Kelautan: Perspektif Keterpaduan dalam Penataan Ruang Darat-Laut. Merajut Inisiatif Lokal Menuju Kebijakan Nasional. Mitra Pesisir (CRMP II), Jakarta.
Biro Pusat Statistik Kabupaten Konawe Selatan. 2016. Kabupaten Konawe Selatan dalam Angka 2016.
Brooks, K., J. Schirmer, S. Pascoe, L. Triantafillos, E. Jebreen, T. Cannard, and C.M. Dichmont. 2015. Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management, Mar. Policy Vol. 53 : 111-122.
Charles, A.T. 2001. Sustainable Fishery Systems. Balckwell Science. Saint Mary’s University Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
De Silva, S.S. 2015. Fisheries enhancements in inland waters with special reference to culture based fisheries in Asia: current status and prospects. Responsible Stocking and Enhancement of Inland Waters in Asia. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok.
Dillon, H.S. 1999. Strategi Pemulihan Ekonomi Indonesia Melalui Pengembangan Agribisnis. Majalah Agribisnis, Manajemen dan Teknologi, Vol. 5 No. 1, IPB-Bogor.
Estevez, R.A., and S. Gelcich. 2015. Participative multi-criteria decision analysis in marine management and conservation: research progress and the challenge of integrating value judgments and uncertainty, Mar. Policy Vol. 61 : 1–7.
Jadwiga, Z. 2008. Evaluation of agri-environmental measures. International Journal of Rural Management Vol. 4 No.1-2: 1-24.
Kolflaath, B.S., 2015. The New Common Fisheries Policy and its Lansing Obligations- implications for Governability and Legitimacy. Norwegian College of Fisheries Science. University of Tromso Master Thesis. Norwegia
Morgan, R. 2017. An investigation of constraints upon fisheries diversification using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Mar. Policy Vol. 86 : 24–30
Leung, P. J. Muraoka, S.T. Nakamoto, and S. Pooley. 1998. Evaluating Fisheries Management Options in Hawaii using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) 1, Fish. Res. Vol. 36 No. 2-3 : 171 – 183.
Pye, K. and R.L.A. John. 2000. Past, Present and Future Interactions, Management Challenges and Research Needs In Coastal and Estuarine Environments. Geological Society, London.
Saaty, T.L. 1977. A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, Vol. 15 : 234-281.
Saaty, T.L. 1993. Pengambilan Keputusan: Proses Hirarki Analitik untuk Pengambilan Keputusan dalam Situasi yang Kompleks. Diterjemahkan: K. Peniwati. PT Pustaka Binaman Pressindo, Jakarta.
Santos, L.C.M., M.A. Gasalla, F. Dahdouh-Guebas, and M.D. Bitencourt. 2017. Socio-ecological assessment for environmental planning in coastal fishery areas: a case study in Brazilian mangroves, Ocean Coast. Manag. Vol.138: 60-69.
Singarimbun, M. dan S. Effendi. 2011. Metoda Penelitian Survei. Edisi Revisi. LP3ES, Jakarta.
Sukadi, M.F. 2006. Perkembangan budidaya rumput laut di Indonesia: kinerja dan prospeknya. Dalam: Cholik, F., S. Moeslim, E.S. Heruwati, T. Ahmad dan A. Jauzi (eds.), 60 Tahun Perikanan Indonesia. Masyarakat Perikanan Nusantara, Jakarta.
Ting, K.H., K.L. Lin, H.T. Jhan, T.J. Huang, C.M. Wang, and W.H. Liu. 2015. Application of a sustainable fisheries development indicator system for Taiwan's aquaculture industry. Aquaculture Vol. 437 : 398–407.
Trono, G.C.Jr. 1995. Seaweed farming: an alternative livelihood for fishers. In: M.A. Juinio-Meñes and G.F. Newkirk (eds.), Philippine Coastal Resources Under Stress. Marine Science Institute, University of the Philippines, Quezon City.
Whitmarsh, D. and M.G. Palmieri. 2009. Social acceptability of marine aquaculture: the use of survey-based methods for eliciting public and stakeholder preferences, Mar. Policy Vol. 33 : 452–457.
Wirartha, I M. 2006. Metodologi Penelitian Sosial Ekonomi. Penerbit Andi, Yogyakarta.
Xu, B. and Y.C. Chang. 2017. The new development of the ocean governance mechanism in Taiwan and its reference for China. Ocean Coast. Manag. Vol. 136 : 56–72.
Copyright (c) 2018 Oce Astuti, Emiyarti Emiyarti, Arman Pariakan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.