Analisis dan Penerapan Metode Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS dalam Penentuan Mitra Industri Sebagai Tempat Praktek Kerja Lapangan
Field Work Practices are part of achieving the expected competencies in the educational process. The suitability of students to companies that serve as street vendors is something that is important to note. The weakness of the previous field work practices system was that there were still many students who were inaccurate in choosing a company or institution as a place for street vendors. This study aims to help determine industry partners in accordance with the competency achievements of each department. The method to be used in this research is Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP) in the process of determining the weight priority of each criterion and the TOPSIS method in carrying out the ranking process. The criteria used are the suitability of the department with the company's core (C1), company credibility (C2), and company commitment (C3). corporate environment (C4), and the facilities provided (C5). Each of these criteria consists of several sub criteria. The weights of the criteria obtained through the FAHP are Furthermore, the process of ranking 37 companies using the TOPSIS method obtained the highest preference value, namely 0.8157.
D. Y. Chang, “Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., vol. 95, no. 3, pp. 649–655, 1996, doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2.
D. Herawatie and E. Wuryanto, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Pemilihan Mahasiswa Berprestasi dengan Metode Fuzzy TOPSIS,” J. Inf. Syst. Eng. Bus. Intell., vol. 3, no. 2, p. 92, 2017, doi: 10.20473/jisebi.3.2.92-100.
V. Julianto, “Rancang Bangun Sistem Informasi Manajemen Bank Sampah Studi Kasus Pada Bank Sampah Panggung Berseri (BSPB),” J. RESTI (Rekayasa Sist. dan Teknol. Informasi), vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 395–401, 2019, doi: 10.29207/resti.v3i3.1133.
M. Elveny and Rahmadsyah, “Analisis Metode Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process ( Fahp ) Dalam Menentukan Posisi Jabatan,” TECHSI - J. Penelit. Tek. Inform., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 111–126, 2014.
F. P. Saputra, N. Hidayat, and M. T. Furqon, “Penerapan Metode Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process ( F-AHP ) Untuk Menentukan Besar Pinjaman Pada Koperasi,” J. Pengemb. Teknol. Inf. dan Ilmu Komput., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1761–1767, 2018, [Online]. Available: file:///C:/Users/DELL/Downloads/1352-1-10168-1-10-20170905.pdf.
M. Dao et al., “A Hybrid Approach Using Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Assessing Environmental Conflicts in the Titan Mining Industry along Central Coast Vietnam,” Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 14, p. 2930, 2019, doi: 10.3390/app9142930.
B. E. Zaiwani, M. Zarlis, and S. Efendi, “Improved hybridization of Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) algorithm with Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making - Simple Additive Weighting (FMADM-SAW),” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 978, no. 1, 2018, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/978/1/012076.
F. R. Lima Junior, L. Osiro, and L. C. R. Carpinetti, “A comparison between Fuzzy AHP and Fuzzy TOPSIS methods to supplier selection,” Appl. Soft Comput. J., vol. 21, pp. 194–209, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.03.014.
A. B. Pakarti, D. M. Imrona, H. Hidayati, and S. Kom, “Analisis Dan Implementasi Metode Fuzzy AHP dan Topsis Untuk Rekomendasi LPK Pelaksana Proyek Pelatihan ( Studi Kasus : Dinas Tenaga Kerja Kota Samarinda ),” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 565–575, 2014.
I. Ertuǧrul and N. Karakaşoǧlu, “Comparison of fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methods for facility location selection,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 39, no. 7–8, pp. 783–795, 2008, doi: 10.1007/s00170-007-1249-8.
Copyright (c) 2020 Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.