Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan

(Studi Kasus BMT El-Raushan)

  • Dede Supiyan Universitas Pamulang
Keywords: decision support system, comparison, simple additive weighting method, weighted product, technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution

Abstract

Decision support system is the composition of a computer-based information system that functions as a supporter of decision making in an organization or company. Decision making in determining the provision of financing is very important because with the right decision the provision of financing can run well. Decision making method is useful for determining the best alternative from a number of other alternatives based on certain criteria, including the simple additive weighting method, Weighted Product and Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. A comparison of the methods of this decision support system is carried out to determine which method provides the highest accuracy value of the financing data for the El-Raushan BMT cooperative. Based on comparison of the SAW Method, Weighted Product and TOPSIS methods show that the Weighted Product method is more accurate than the simple additive weighting method Technique For Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution. Judging from the value of the accuracy of the three methods with the highest accuracy WP (Weighted Product) method with an accuracy value of 94%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Mukhlis and I. S. Beik, “Analisis Faktor-faktor yang Memengaruhi Tingkat Kepatuhan Membayar Zakat: Studi Kasus Kabupaten Bogor,” Al-Muzara’ah, 2013.

L. Anggraeni, H. Puspitasari, S. El Ayyubi, and R. Wiliasih, “Akses UMKM terhadap Pembiayaan Mikro Syariah dan Dampaknya terhadap Perkembangan Usaha: Kasus BMT Tadbiirul Ummah, Kabupaten Bogor,” Al-Muzara’ah, 2013.

Kementrian Perdagangan, “Analisis Peran Lembaga Pembiayaan Dalam Pengembangan UMKM,” Pus. Kebijak. Perdagang. Dalam Negeri, 2013.

I. G. K. Baskara, “Lembaga Keuangan Mikro di Indonesia,” Bul. Stud. Ekon., 2013.

A. Hamberto, P. B. Katili, and N. Ummi, “Pemilihan Supplier Material Berdasarkan Multi Attribute Decision Making (MADM) Menggunakan SAW, WP dan TOPSIS,” J. Tek. Ind., 2013.

S. H. Kusumadewi, “Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making (Fuzzy MADM),” Graha Ilmu Yogyakarta, 2006.

Published
2019-12-21
How to Cite
Supiyan, D. (2019). Perbandingan Metode SAW, WP Dan Topsis Dalam Penentuan Pembiayaan. Jurnal Ilmiah Informatika, 4(2), 88-94. https://doi.org/10.35316/jimi.v4i2.544
Abstract viewed = 72 times
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 0 times Plagiarism (Bahasa Indonesia) downloaded = 0 times