THE EFFECT OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY LEARNING MODEL IMPROVEMENT ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

Keywords: Learning Model, Probability, Statistics, Two Way Anova

Abstract

The Statistics dan Probability class is one of the elective courses that have to be enrolled by students who have just joined the beginning of the semester. That is because studying Statistics and Probability is crucial in providing the first foundation for knowledge in other scientific domains. In actuality, though, a lot of students struggle with this course. Many students claim that they have trouble understanding the subjects they are learning, and they also have trouble figuring out how to answer the lecturer's questions. The low cognitive ability of students, which results in limited student creativity in problem-solving skills, is one of the elements contributing to students' failure to comprehend the subject. Of course, this is a severe issue if nothing is done right away. Based on these issues, researchers who were also lecturers improved the teaching strategies for all classes. This study aims to determine whether there is substantial interaction between class schedule and the development of learning model that impact exam scores by raising students' Statistics and Probability scores. The two-way Anova analysis principle is the basis of the study methodology. The enhancement of learning model used outside and inside the classroom was found to have a substantial interaction based on the research findings on fifty samples of students selected from different class. A significance score of 0.000 indicates that these findings are significant. In other words, a model is required to achieve better learning outcomes, which might make it simpler for students to commence learning and provide a common purpose for learning. Since multiple class schedules exist, each learning model necessitates a unique management system and learning environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S. (2013). Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran di Universitas. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. https://prenadamedia.com/

Ahriani, F. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif dan Gaya Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Peserta Didik Kelas X SMK Negeri 2 Bantaeng. Chemica: Jurnal Ilmiah Kimia Dan Pendidikan Kimia, 14(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.35580/chemica.v14i1.782

Amanda, N. W. Y., Subagia, I. W., & Tika, I. N. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Ditinjau Dari Self Efficacy Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 1–11. Retrieved from https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1106

Bertinetto, C., Engel, J., & Jansen, J. (2020). ANOVA simultaneous component analysis: A tutorial review. Analytica Chimica Acta: X, 6(1), 100061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100061

Damayanti, M., & Jirana, J. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Minat Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMAN 1 Tinambung. Saintifik, 4(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.31605/saintifik.v4i1.143

Emrisena, A., Abdurrahman, A., & Suyanto, E. (2018). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 6(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v6i2.1306

Fitri, S. F. N. (2021). Problematika Kualitas Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 5(1), 1617–1620. Retrieved from https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/1148

Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2018). An R companion to applied regression. Retrieved from https://toc.library.ethz.ch/objects/pdf03/z01_978-1-5443-3647-3_01.pdf

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (Vol. 7). Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED323168

Friedrich, S., Konietschke, F., & Pauly, M. (2017). GFD: An R package for the analysis of general factorial designs. Journal of Statistical Software, 79(July). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v079.c01

Frossard, J., & Renaud, O. (2021). Permutation tests for regression, anova, and comparison of signals: The permuco package. Journal of Statistical Software, 99(15). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v099.i15

Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisa Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 23. Cetakan ke-8. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/pustaka/148190/aplikasi-analisis-multivariate-dengan-program-ibm-spss-25.html

Hamruni, H. (2015). Konsep Dasar Dan Implementasi Pembelajaran Kontekstual. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 12(2), 177–187. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpai.2015.122-04

Hanafiah, N., & Suhana, C. (2012). Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama. https://inlislite.uin-suska.ac.id/opac/detail-opac?id=20723

Kéry, M. (2010). Introduction to WinBUGS for ecologists: Bayesian approach to regression, ANOVA, mixed models and related analyses. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780123786050/introduction-to-winbugs-for-ecologists

Laili, H. (2017). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran terhadap Kemampuan Mahasiswa dalam Menerapkan Model-Model Pembelajaran pada Perkuliahan Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika. Fondatia, 1(2), 131–149. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v1i2.106

Laksemiwati, N. L. A. (2019). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team Archievemen Division (Stad) Untuk Meningkatkan Motivasi Dan Hasil Belajar Tata Hidang. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v3i1.17115

MacFarland, T. W. (2011). Two-way analysis of variance: statistical tests and graphics using R. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-1-4614-2134-4

Mahesya, W. G., Triwijati, N. K. E., & Fuadhy, R. M. (2021). Fenomenologi Spiritual Experience Pada Mualaf Yang Berlatar Belakang Kristen. Al-Adyan: Jurnal Studi Lintas Agama, 16(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajsla.v16i2.9446

Marhadi, H., & Erlisnawati, E. (2016). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Manajemen Kelas dengan Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Universitas Riau. Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33578/jpfkip.v5i1.3673

Narpila, S. D., & Sihotang, S. F. (2022). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Inquiry Berbantuan Kalkulator Pada Siswa Kelas VII SMP Al Ulum Medan. Genta Mulia: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 10(2), 166–177. Retrieved from https://www.ejournal.stkipbbm.ac.id/index.php/gm/article/view/351

Nielsen, F., Srinivasa, A., & Rao, C. R. (2022). Handbook of statistics 46 : Geometry and Statistics. 1st Edition. USA: Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/geometry-and-statistics/nielsen/978-0-323-91345-4

Pujilestari, S. (2018). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Open-Ended Problem Dengan Model Think-Pair- Share Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif. Factor M, 1(1), 57–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v1i1.964

Rahman, R. (2012). Hubungan Antara Self-Concept Terhadap Matematika Dengan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematik Siswa. Infinity Journal, 1(1), 19. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v1i1.p19-30

Rahmi, Mardiyah, A., & Ratulani, J. (2017). Analisis Kebutuhan Mahasiswa Dalam Mengikuti Perkuliahan Aljabar Linear Elementer. Lemma, 3(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22202/jl.2017.v3i2.812

Scheff, S. W. (2016). Fundamental statistical principles for the neurobiologist: A survival guide. Retrieved from https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128047538/fundamental-statistical-principles-for-the-neurobiologist

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative and R & D Research Methods. Bandung: Alfabeta CV. https://openlibrary.telkomuniversity.ac.id/home/catalog/id/10026/slug/metode-penelitian-kuantitatif-kualitatif-dan-r-d.html

Syofian, S., & Siregar, I. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dilengkapi dengan perbandingan perhitungan manual dan SPSS. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group. http://opac.iainkediri.ac.id/opac/index.php?p=show_detail&id=24386

Tayeb, T., Idris, R., & Sulherah, A. (2014). Peranan Mata Kuliah Statistika dalam Memahami Mata Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian Bagi Mahasiswa Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Keguruan UIN Alauddin Makassar. MaPan : Jurnal Matematika Dan Pembelajaran, 2(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.24252/mapan.2014v2n1a8

Widaningsih, N., & Yenni. (2016). Perbandingan Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Antara Yang Mendapat Model Pembelajaran Course Review Horay Dan Numbered Head Together. Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 9(1), 116–123. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v9i1.987

Wilcox, R. R. (2003). Applying Contempory Statistical Technique, Chapter 10– Two Way Anova, 329-360. University of Southern California, Los Angels, CA. USA: Academic Press. https://www.elsevier.com/books/applying-contemporary-statistical-techniques/wilcox/978-0-12-751541-0

Wulan, E. R., & Anggraini, R. E. (2019). Gaya Kognitif Field-Dependent dan Field-Independent sebagai Jendela Profil Pemecahan Masalah Polya dari Siswa SMP. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 1(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v1i2.1503

Yenni, Y. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Mahasiswa Dalam Menyiapkan Pembelajaran Yang Efektif Pada Mata Kuliah Sbmm. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2038

Zhang, J.-T. (2012). An approximate degrees of freedom test for heteroscedastic two-way ANOVA. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference, 142(1), 336–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspi.2011.07.023

Zulfikri, Z. (2017). Pengaruh Mata Kuliah Statistik Terhadap Kemampuan Analisa Data Kuantitatif Mahasiswa Prodi S-1 Ilmu Perpustakaan Angkatan 2011-2012 Fakultas Adab dan Humaniora UIN Ar-Raniry. LIBRIA, 8(1), 111–128. https://doi.org/10.22373/1229

Published
2022-07-30
How to Cite
Sihotang, S. F., & Zuhri, Z. (2022). THE EFFECT OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY LEARNING MODEL IMPROVEMENT ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 4(1), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2022.v4i1.65-81
Abstract viewed = 518 times
FULL TEXT PDF downloaded = 320 times