DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING TEST INSTRUMENTS

Keywords: Development, Mathematics, Critical Thinking, Instrument Test

Abstract

Improving the quality of education to encourage students to have 21st century abilities needs to be balanced with a test instrument that is able to measure students' 21st century abilities. The ability to think critically is one of the 21st century abilities that every student must have. Based on the indications, this study was carried out to create a test instrument capable of testing students' critical thinking skills. This research is classified as development research since it is based on the following stages of development: information collection, planning, initial product development, limited trial, initial product revision, field trial, and final product revision. Scale and comparison are the topics. In Sleman, Indonesia, 11th-grade students participated in the product testing. To establish a good category in general, product validity is based on expert opinion, item validity, discriminatory power, level of difficulty, and dependability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Ghamdi, A. K. H., & Deraney, P. M. (2013). Effects of Teaching Critical Thinking to Saudi Female University Students Using a Stand-Alone Course. International Education Studies, 6(7), 176–188.

Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan Evaluasi Pendidikan Edisi 3. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

As’ari, A. R., Ali, M., Basri, H., Kurniati, D., & Maharani, S. (2019). Mengembangkan HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) Melalui Matematika. Universitas Negeri Malang.

Azizah, M., Sulianto, J., & Cintang, N. (2018). Analisis keterampilan berpikir kritis Siswa sekolah dasar pada pembelajaran matematika kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 35(1), 61–70.

Cayani, S., & Saltifa, P. (2021). Pengembangan Soal Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Materi Bilangan Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Equation: Teori Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 103–114.

Djawad, Y. A. (2018). Innovation In Learning Through Digital Literacy at Vocational School of Health. International Conference on Indonesian Technical Vocational Education and Association (APTEKINDO 2018), 201, 239–245. Atlantis Press.

Hamzah, A. (2021). Metode Penelitian & Pengembangan (Research & Development) Uji Produk Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif Proses dan Hasil Dilengkapi Contoh Proposal Pengembangan Desain Uji Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. CV Literasi Nusantara Abadi.

PeranginAngin, R. B., Panjaitan, S., Hutauruk, A., Manik, E., & Tambunan, H. (2021). Arah dan Trend Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika di Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika (JRPM). Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Matematika, 3(1), 49–62.

Schraw, G., & Robinson, D. H. (2011). Assessment of higher order thinking skills. IAP.

Shalikhah, N. D., Purnanto, A. W., & Nugroho, I. (2021). Soal Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Matematika Pada Buku Tematik Terpadu Kurikulum 2013. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 701–709.

Sugiyono, S. (2017). Metode Penelitian Bisnis: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, Kombinasi, dan R&D. Penerbit CV. Alfabeta: Bandung.

Vehovar, V., Toepoel, V., & Steinmetz, S. (2016). Non-probability sampling. The Sage Handbook of Survey Methods, 329–345.

Widyaningsih, S. W., Yusuf, I., Prasetyo, Z. K., & Istiyono, E. (2021). The Development of the HOTS Test of Physics Based on Modern Test Theory: Question Modeling through E-learning of Moodle LMS. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 51–68.

Yusup, F. (2018). Uji validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian kuantitatif. Tarbiyah: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 7(1), 17–23.

Zhou, P., Zuo, D., Hou, K.-M., & Zhang, Z. (2017). A decentralized compositional framework for dependable decision process in self-managed cyber physical systems. Sensors, 17(11), 2580.

Published
2021-12-30
How to Cite
Waliyuddin, D. S., & Sulisworo, D. (2021). DEVELOPMENT OF MATHEMATICAL CRITICAL THINKING TEST INSTRUMENTS. Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(2), 159-169. https://doi.org/10.35316/alifmatika.2021.v3i2.159-169
Abstract viewed = 371 times
FULL TEXT PDF downloaded = 269 times